Thanks to Julz at Marsters Mobsters for this cute tidbit:
"Since Emma Caulfield is in Australia at the moment, there was an
interview on TV yesterday morning where you could email in questions
for her, which of course I taped... and picked out the most
interesting for you to read (There are actually 2 interviewers,
but I mushed them together)"
Quote:
INTERVIEWER: Well, this is a very meaningful question from Francis: Who is a better kisser, James or Nicholas?
(much laughter from both parties)
EMMA: There it is... there it is. Ohhhh...
INT: I take it you get asked that a lot.
EM: I do, I do. Ummm... Who's a... They're just different!
INT: No, come on! Such a diplomat.
EM: Alright, alright, alright, alright... James! Are you happy? Now I'm in trouble.
INT: Why?
EM: Why!? Why is he a better kisser? Or why am I in trouble?
INT: Well, no, why is he a better kisser?
EM: Ummm *insert various signs of hesitation*. There's just a lotta... there's a (laugh) oh wow, wow. There's a lot of commitment to his... to his...
INT: Kissing?
EM: Technique.
"Since Emma Caulfield is in Australia at the moment, there was an
interview on TV yesterday morning where you could email in questions
for her, which of course I taped... and picked out the most
interesting for you to read (There are actually 2 interviewers,
but I mushed them together)"
Quote:
INTERVIEWER: Well, this is a very meaningful question from Francis: Who is a better kisser, James or Nicholas?
(much laughter from both parties)
EMMA: There it is... there it is. Ohhhh...
INT: I take it you get asked that a lot.
EM: I do, I do. Ummm... Who's a... They're just different!
INT: No, come on! Such a diplomat.
EM: Alright, alright, alright, alright... James! Are you happy? Now I'm in trouble.
INT: Why?
EM: Why!? Why is he a better kisser? Or why am I in trouble?
INT: Well, no, why is he a better kisser?
EM: Ummm *insert various signs of hesitation*. There's just a lotta... there's a (laugh) oh wow, wow. There's a lot of commitment to his... to his...
INT: Kissing?
EM: Technique.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-04 09:22 am (UTC)