blah blah blah aw shit blah
Jun. 1st, 2003 12:57 amI cut out immediately, only read the one line, but fuck, that sucks.
I mean, I've been telling myself I wasn't sure about Angel viewing replacing loss of Buffy, but like most of the rest of you I'm no better than a Trekkie when it comes to loyalty to spinoffs. If it's there, hell YEAH I'm gonna watch it.
Spoilers suck. Not the content, but the fact that they're out there.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-01 01:10 am (UTC)::note to self - be extra, extra cautious about spoilers!::
no subject
Date: 2003-06-01 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-01 01:31 am (UTC)And don't worry, it wasn't an Angel spoiler, but what might have happened had the Faith spin off happened.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-01 01:34 am (UTC)Well, if that's the case... in that context, that would have been lame. Glad to hear.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-01 02:53 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-01 03:08 am (UTC)I will. thanks.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-01 07:34 am (UTC)(If I may asked, what exactly sucks? The fact that you're very tinily spoiled now or the spoiler itself?)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-01 08:44 am (UTC)Dude, I just read those, and it sounds like a BtVS fic I've been playing with on and off since March. This is so friggin' bizarre and think it's doubtful they're remotely true unless ME and Co. actually read fanfic.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-01 12:25 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-01 12:32 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-01 12:34 pm (UTC)However.. ::evil laugh:: OBVIOUSLY YOU WERE GUILTY ANYWAY! DO YOU HEAR THE BEATING OF THAT HEART BENEATH THE FLOORBOARDS!? HUH?! I BET YOU DO!
(If I may asked, what exactly sucks? The fact that you're very tinily spoiled now or the spoiler itself?)
let me reiterate my post:
Spoilers suck. Not the content, but the fact that they're out there.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-02 09:45 am (UTC)Mer
Re:
Date: 2003-06-02 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-02 10:52 am (UTC)Mer