blah blah blah aw shit blah

[timepiececlock]

I'm bummed. I just followed a link of someone's lj reccommending someone else's "logic" (both of whose journals I read), but when I read the first line I realized that what I'd been linked to was an AtS spoiler post.

I cut out immediately, only read the one line, but fuck, that sucks.

I mean, I've been telling myself I wasn't sure about Angel viewing replacing loss of Buffy, but like most of the rest of you I'm no better than a Trekkie when it comes to loyalty to spinoffs. If it's there, hell YEAH I'm gonna watch it.

Spoilers suck. Not the content, but the fact that they're out there.

Comments

[stakebait.livejournal.com]

Kita's link to me, yes? It's not an ATS spoiler. It was about one of the other spin-off show ideas that didn't happen. I seriously doubt they're going to go that way on Angel.

Mer

Re:

[rashaka.livejournal.com]

Yep, that's what everyone's told me. thanks though. Maybe I should put a strikethrough line over my whole post so everyone knows it's not a prob anymore?

[stakebait.livejournal.com]

Or just edit to add that it's been solved. Although I doubt too many more folks will be finding it new and answer at this point, since they're catching up on several days worth of posts. I wouldn't have except that I knew it was me you were referring to.

Mer