(no subject)
Jun. 19th, 2004 10:29 pm::rewatching X-Men 2 for the first time since it was in theaters::
I still can't believe they included Rogue in Mystique's various "temptation" forms for Logan. I love that they did, but I can't believe that they did. I'm so used to movies (especially movies with this much draw of a younger audience) being tamed down, that for them to have that allowed that blatant suggestion of cradlerobbing to be included boggles me. Movies just don't do limit-testing things like that in uber-commercialized films.
It is sort of a continuation of the first movie. The first movie had a hundred times more UST between Rogue/Wolverine than between Wolverine/Jean. Still does, though the W/J chemistry did get a bit better this time around. But I thought that the R/W sexual tension could be rationalized away as an unintended result of the actors doing their thing and covered by the writers attempts at a W/J/Cyclops love triangle. The same thing in this film-- only now instead of just the actors gazing at each other, the UST has actually been written in.
Now, one could say that it was meant to be just Mystique freaking him out and it doesn't mean that there is any sexual attraction at all on Logan's part, and that Mystique was fishing for things to bait him with.
But come on. That just doesn't fly with the cast you've assembled here. Maybe if Hugh Jackman and Anna Pacquin had played it completely platonic and paternal from minute one of the first film, maybe that would fly. But the director just forgot to mention that or something I think.
That or the director wanted the semi-flirtation there as a contrast to the Jean/Wolverine thing... or maybe just to titilate the audience.
Either way, I'm surprised it got past all the censorship from the moneybackers.
And now I'm getting a desire to read Mystique/Wolverine NC17 fic of that scene with Wolverine/Rogue hints. Cause they never really explain why she went in there.
I guess she was just horny.
Oh well, good for her I guess. Get laid with a hot guy and take a moment to emotionally screw around with your enemy at the same time. Two birds with one stone.
I still can't believe they included Rogue in Mystique's various "temptation" forms for Logan. I love that they did, but I can't believe that they did. I'm so used to movies (especially movies with this much draw of a younger audience) being tamed down, that for them to have that allowed that blatant suggestion of cradlerobbing to be included boggles me. Movies just don't do limit-testing things like that in uber-commercialized films.
It is sort of a continuation of the first movie. The first movie had a hundred times more UST between Rogue/Wolverine than between Wolverine/Jean. Still does, though the W/J chemistry did get a bit better this time around. But I thought that the R/W sexual tension could be rationalized away as an unintended result of the actors doing their thing and covered by the writers attempts at a W/J/Cyclops love triangle. The same thing in this film-- only now instead of just the actors gazing at each other, the UST has actually been written in.
Now, one could say that it was meant to be just Mystique freaking him out and it doesn't mean that there is any sexual attraction at all on Logan's part, and that Mystique was fishing for things to bait him with.
But come on. That just doesn't fly with the cast you've assembled here. Maybe if Hugh Jackman and Anna Pacquin had played it completely platonic and paternal from minute one of the first film, maybe that would fly. But the director just forgot to mention that or something I think.
That or the director wanted the semi-flirtation there as a contrast to the Jean/Wolverine thing... or maybe just to titilate the audience.
Either way, I'm surprised it got past all the censorship from the moneybackers.
And now I'm getting a desire to read Mystique/Wolverine NC17 fic of that scene with Wolverine/Rogue hints. Cause they never really explain why she went in there.
I guess she was just horny.
Oh well, good for her I guess. Get laid with a hot guy and take a moment to emotionally screw around with your enemy at the same time. Two birds with one stone.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 11:17 pm (UTC)I was also kinda impressed/surprised that they put the Rogue-as-possible-temptation thing in there, making a direct reference to it, even. I mean, for such a mainstream--and PG13!--movie it's pretty daring, in that respect. Taboo, even.
Since I'm such a big fan of the Wolverine/Rogue ship, I remember trying to stay objective and rationalizing that just because Mystique makes an assumption about their relationship doesn't mean it's true. But I agree that Jackman and Paquin would've played it more obviously platonic, if that's the case. If I knew more about the comics the director's intentions might be clearer to me, depending on how true to cannon he was being.
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at least one fic that meets those requirements. I wish I could remember where for sure so I could link it to you. It might have been on Te's site. Either a fic she wrote or recced. You might want to check there.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-19 11:39 pm (UTC)Oh irony. I just now recced a fic by her, a crossover. I don't know if I linked to *her* site or not, beause it was a general archive. What's her site?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 01:40 am (UTC)Heh. Now *I'm* gonna read the fic you just recced. *g*
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 06:05 am (UTC)They practically had their own love theme! And even though the W/J improved a bit in the 2nd movie it still didn't hold a candle to W/R. Plus, Jean's new haircut? A thousand times no.
I still can't believe they included Rogue in Mystique's various "temptation" forms for Logan. I love that they did, but I can't believe that they did.
When I saw it the first time in the theatre I was convinced that my eyes were playing tricks on me. No way was that what I thought it was. And then when I found out it was? *squee*
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:40 am (UTC)*makes Spike and Faye icons*
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:47 am (UTC)oh, that reminds me!
I wanted to point you to this song. Have you ever heard "This Woman's Work" by Kate Bush? Because I was thinking it was totally made for VashXMeryl. Well if you ignore the childbirth part and just focus on the love and regrets. I was gonna thrw it to you and see if I could bully you into making icons. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 10:58 am (UTC)here are the lyrics:
"This Woman's Work"
I hold...
I hold you...
Pray to God you can cope.
I stand outside this woman's work,
This woman's world.
Ooh, it's hard on the man,
Now his part is over.
Now starts the craft of the father.
I know you have a little life in you yet.
I know you have a lot of strength left.
I know you have a little life in you yet.
I know you have a lot of strength left.
I should be crying, but I just can't let it show.
I should be hoping, but I can't stop thinking
Of all the things I should've said,
That I never said.
All the things we should've done,
That we never did.
All the things I should've given,
But I didn't.
Oh, darling, make it go,
Make it go away.
Give me these moments back.
Give them back to me.
Give me that little kiss.
Give me your hand.
I know you have a little life in you yet.
I know you have a lot of strength left.
I know you have a little life in you yet.
I know you have a lot of strength left.
I should be crying, but I just can't let it show.
I should be hoping, but I can't stop thinking
Of all the things we should've said,
That were never said.
All the things we should've done,
That we never did.
All the things that you needed from me.
All the things that you wanted for me.
All the things that I should've given,
But I didn't.
Oh, darling, make it go away.
Just make it go away now.
--
Her voice is beautifully suited to the song. I once made a Buffy/Spike icon set to it, a long long time ago:
http://www.livejournal.com/community/buffy_icons/529403.html
Looking back, they're kind of amatuerish. But I still love that song for them. And for Vash/Meryl too, now.
pretty sounds
Date: 2004-06-20 11:11 am (UTC)That I never said.
All the things we should've done,
That we never did.
All the things I should've given,
But I didn't.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 01:54 pm (UTC)Two questions:
1. Did Mystique shift into Storm in that scene? I can't remember, but it would make more sense if she didn't.
2. What's the U in UST stand for? Unconsummated?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 02:05 pm (UTC)1. Yes. She went through Jean, then Storm, then Rogue. Then she went back to Jean again, then backed off and taunted him with Stryker's image.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 04:18 pm (UTC)But still... That's weird. Oo;
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 05:24 pm (UTC)Some would say it remained unresolved by the end.
1. Yes. She went through Jean, then Storm, then Rogue. Then she went back to Jean again, then backed off and taunted him with Stryker's image.
Ah yes, now I remember. I think the Stryker/Wolverine made me forget about Rogue. Well, having Storm in there crushes my theory -- she has NO chemistry with Wolverine. Either way, Mystique is deliciously nasty.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 05:27 pm (UTC)They slept together and had a baby. There may still be tension, but by then its' just plain sexual tension, not unresolved sexual tension.
Either way, Mystique is deliciously nasty.
Yeah. My first reaction when I saw the second movie (weirdly, not the first) was "I want my own Mystique! Where can I get one? Where, where?"
Re: pretty sounds
Date: 2004-06-20 08:19 pm (UTC)Re: pretty sounds
Date: 2004-06-20 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 09:37 pm (UTC)Oh right. It was the rest of the show that was unresolved.
Yeah. My first reaction when I saw the second movie (weirdly, not the first) was "I want my own Mystique! Where can I get one? Where, where?"
Do you get the feeling she'd take over if she didn't respect Magneto so much? And I don't even like Rebecca Romijn-Stamos!
no subject
Date: 2004-06-20 09:54 pm (UTC)Yeah, I got the feeling that she was perfectly capable and the only reason she did was that she respected/cared so much.
And I don't even like Rebecca Romijn-Stamos!
Me either. I think all that make-up helps.