WHY? WHY? Why is that necessary?
*Warning: loss of soul or heart attack is not my responsibility.
EDIT: It's like some sick masochistic urge. I keep going back to the link, watching for a few seconds, then shrieking like a ten year old girl and exiting out the window in a hurry. Make it go AWAY! It's too horrible.
EDIT 2: I wish my parents weren't visiting relatives in Northern California right now. I think I need a hug. From my mom.
*Warning: loss of soul or heart attack is not my responsibility.
EDIT: It's like some sick masochistic urge. I keep going back to the link, watching for a few seconds, then shrieking like a ten year old girl and exiting out the window in a hurry. Make it go AWAY! It's too horrible.
EDIT 2: I wish my parents weren't visiting relatives in Northern California right now. I think I need a hug. From my mom.
Re: a rec for you too, and general random late night thoughts
Date: 2005-06-14 02:55 am (UTC)Point. *contemplates* So what makes the two situations different? Well, in Genesis of The Daleks, it wasn't a decision between allowing the universe to be destroyed or committing genocide. It was a choice between leaving the future alone, or stepping in to change it. And the future, as he knew it, wasn't so bad. The Daleks were manageable, as far as he could see.
He even tells Sarah, when she calls him on flinching from his purpose, that peace treaties and alliances have been formed between species that otherwise might have fought each other, because of Dalek aggression.
So, the existence of the universe had to hang in the balance for him to go as far as he did later.
Re: a rec for you too, and general random late night thoughts
Date: 2005-06-14 03:03 am (UTC)...perhaps I shouldn't, though.
Re: a rec for you too, and general random late night thoughts
Date: 2005-06-14 03:04 am (UTC)