![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't care if he fucked Britney Spears-- Collin Farrel is freakin' hot.
And his accent. I knew he had one but I didn't realize just how well he'd been faking Americana in those movies until now. Sex-y.
All the cameras seemed permanently focused on Salma Hayek's breasts.
I'm surprised Chicago won over The Hours and The Pianist. Especially since LOTR was a better movie than Chicago, for all I enjoyed the latter.
I think it was a poor mark on the Acedemy to give Roman Polanski a personal award, or even to nominate him. The possibility of giving a collaberative work like a feature film the Best Picure award is one thing (and it seems like everyone agrees The Pianist was an amazing movie), but to give the man personally award is a mistake. And I wish he had shown up personally, so he could have gotten arrested.
I'm sad I missed Adrian Brody's acceptance speech. It sounds from everyone else like it was adorable.
I :heart: Michael Moore. Even though he was boo-ed off-stage by the same audience that clapped for his winning, and even though he took the opportunity to shamelessly spout his politics-- can you blame him?What better opportunity for attention-- I still think his movies kick ass and he deserved it.
And his accent. I knew he had one but I didn't realize just how well he'd been faking Americana in those movies until now. Sex-y.
All the cameras seemed permanently focused on Salma Hayek's breasts.
I'm surprised Chicago won over The Hours and The Pianist. Especially since LOTR was a better movie than Chicago, for all I enjoyed the latter.
I think it was a poor mark on the Acedemy to give Roman Polanski a personal award, or even to nominate him. The possibility of giving a collaberative work like a feature film the Best Picure award is one thing (and it seems like everyone agrees The Pianist was an amazing movie), but to give the man personally award is a mistake. And I wish he had shown up personally, so he could have gotten arrested.
I'm sad I missed Adrian Brody's acceptance speech. It sounds from everyone else like it was adorable.
I :heart: Michael Moore. Even though he was boo-ed off-stage by the same audience that clapped for his winning, and even though he took the opportunity to shamelessly spout his politics-- can you blame him?What better opportunity for attention-- I still think his movies kick ass and he deserved it.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:05 pm (UTC)we were totally doing "jiggle-ometer" action...except it was all about queen latifah's breasts.
I'm sad I missed Adrian Brody's acceptance speech. It sounds from everyone else like it was adorable.
gorgeous little adrien brody & his terribly fabulous eyebrows had the best speech ever. he was so real. i think it actually topped ally sheedy's acceptance speech at the independent spirit awards several years ago. someone brought her a chair in the middle of her speech.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:08 pm (UTC)Hm... I wonder if anyone will have it available for download online? I've got no idea where one would download that though.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:21 pm (UTC)I need to fuck Colin Farrell's accent. If not Colin himself.
And I MISSED Catherine and Queen Latifah perform "I Move On." Was it good?
Finally, Michael Moore: Brave, brave man. I applauded him loudly.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:34 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:52 pm (UTC)Besides, he was at the Oscars with his pregnant girlfriend. Who wasn't Britney, I might add.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 11:44 pm (UTC)I hadn't thought of that.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:22 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:29 pm (UTC)http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2002-12-19/cover_story.php
Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:35 pm (UTC)But there's something about his little barely-there smile... yeah, he gets my attention anyway.
Sort of like David Duchovny-- there's no individual part of him that is particularly attractive, but somehow the whole, put together, works. Plus, he looked good for the brief 1-second clip I managed to see of him.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:38 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:37 pm (UTC)But I love his face ... it's so expressive and melancholy.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:57 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 11:00 pm (UTC)Damn! He took down his Spike icons for Calvin & Hobbes...
::googles for a picture::
Damn. You're so right.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 12:42 pm (UTC)Dude! You are so right! now if he only sounded like David Lucas, I would have to kidnap him immediatly.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:28 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-23 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:29 pm (UTC)Queen Latifah is now firmly on my list of Women I Would Readily Go Gay For. And I'm not even all that wild about her rapping skills. But GUH. DRESS. *GUHHH.*
You may keep all of Colin Farrell. His eyebrows are too mesmerizing for me to find him attractive. Caterpillar-eyebrows, going up and down, up and down...he was funny introducing U2, though. "They're Irish! And they're an inspiration! And and and they're so keeeeewwwwlllll!" He totally wants to have U2's very Irish babies.
I haven't seen any Adrien Brody movie except "Angels in the Outfield" (which CAN'T be his best work), but I absolutely have to see more now because he was So Incredibly Adorable. He was sweet and bouncy and earnest and endearing! "There comes a time in life when everything seems to make sense...and...this is not one of those times." MWEHEHEHE! The shout-out to his friend in Kuwait was sweet. And he snarked at the show-runners when they tried playing music to cut him off! "CUT IT OUT!" He get SO many bonus points for that!
And they're going to give "Return of the King" the Best Picture Oscar even if it involves Frodo reading the phone book (do they have phones in Middle Earth?) aloud for three hours, because they'll feel so guilty for shafting the first two movies. More precisely, they'll give RotK the award because they'll feel so afraid of the multi-legions of howling fannits who will chase them down if they don't.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-23 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-24 12:21 am (UTC)I am glad Micheal mooore won too. Its a very good documentary/movie, and now seems to be the right time to ask the questions he asked. I didn't see the cermony, but thousands of other actors etc sprout politics or over wrought sentiment (I remeber Hilary Swank's acceptance speech...dear God!)so I don't see why he shouldn't.
Not a big Roman Polanski fan are you? I shouldn't be surpirced by tasteless awards from the Academy though...
Re:
Date: 2003-03-24 12:34 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-24 12:42 am (UTC)Well his movies vary in quality from very good to very poor. He was much better before the whole Sharon Tate thing you know...
I am aware he is running form a statutory rape charge (don't have that crime here, there is in fact a whole seperate law giving rise to the less elegant charge of Intercourse with a girl under the age of 16 or Intercourse with a girl under the age of 14). I forget how old the girl was in Mr Polabkski's case.
Directors and producers always take all the credit for a given movie, I just always thought that was the way it was. And yeah the academy are tastless (and according to my Mother should be renamed the "klu klux Academy" after there startling relucantance to give Black actors Oscars. Shes not forgiven them just because of last year you know).
Re:
Date: 2003-03-24 01:45 am (UTC)I think she was fifteen. Also, some of the laws on ages statutory rape might vary state to state... I doubt it, but I'm not absolutely certain. I do know that in California, if both people are under 18 and within two years of age, it's not outlawed. Any older though-- say one is 19 and one is 17, it is illegal. Again, I'm not sure what the bottom of that margin is; can a 14 year old have legal sex with a 12 year old? I couldn't say I knew. But that isn't brought up as much.
"klu klux Academy"
Technically, it's Ku Klux. As to the black actors being passed over-- I'd actually hold more blame for that against the Emmy awards and television rather than film. But in all places of media... progress is regrettably slow. Such is one of the many problems in the world.
Blech, I agree
Date: 2003-03-24 03:19 am (UTC)As an aside, it's so silly how the attendees just clap mindlessly, and stand up when everyone else does, etc. I love the awards but jeepers, it's like watching a group of people operated by a collective (lack of?) brain ;o) Michael Moore deserves an award for bravery. I was surprised he won, just because it was kinda obvious he'd say something controversial. Well deserved, though. Bowling For Colombine was very thought-provoking.
I personally want to see The Pianist, but agree that 'tasteless' is the word for the Polanski thing. The fact that he got a standing ovation in his absence is just wrong. Hello, he *fleed* the country. After having illegal sex with a *13* year old. Yeah, what a prince. Everyone on their feet!
I'm in lust with Queen Latifah also. Pregnant Catherine ZJ was just incredibly sexy. And talk about emphasising your good points! Holy heck was that cleavage! I may be imagining things but it seemed to me there were a lot more 'normal-sized' women at the awards. Not heaps or anything, but more. It was really niced, and they looked much better than some of the thinner ones (where did Nicole Kidman go?!?).
Anyway, enough from me. The awards just ended here, and the news brings back the rather harsh reality of life outside LA.
Helen
Hmm, interesting
Date: 2003-03-24 03:32 am (UTC)Polanski's lawyers have begun negotiating with Los Angeles prosecutors to allow the now-64-year-old director back into the States without serving jail time.
Geimer [the girl he statutorily raped], who lives with her family in Hawaii, says it's fine with her. "I really wish this would be over, that he would reach agreement with the courts, no longer be a fugitive."
She also tells Inside Edition that she wouldn't call the episode rape, but the sex was not consensual. "I perceived it as he made me have sex with him," she says. "The word 'rape' always brings to mind for me a level of...violence that wasn't there."
Also, he apparently started a relationship with then 15yr old Natassja Kinski as soon as he feld the country.
Although it's still incredibly tasteless, I am at least relieved that the victim didn't sit, upset in her living room, watching as Polanski was given a standing ovation.
Really going now,
Helen
Re: Hmm, interesting
Date: 2003-03-24 08:20 am (UTC)Yes, at least there's that. They still shouldn't let him back in, though.
Thanks for the article quote.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-24 03:53 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-24 08:20 am (UTC)Re: Roman Polanski.
Date: 2003-03-24 12:27 pm (UTC)The standing ovation though? Dumb.